דף הביתשיעוריםBerakhot

Berakhot 140

נושא: Berakhot

Bet Midrash Virtuali

BET MIDRASH VIRTUALI

of the Rabbinical Assembly in Israel


RABIN MISHNAH STUDY GROUP


TRACTATE BERAKHOT, CHAPTER EIGHT, MISHNAH ONE (recap):

The following are differences between Bet Hillel and Bet Shammai concerning dining:- Bet Shammai say that one should first recite the blessing over "the day" and afterwards the one over the wine; whereas Bet Hillel say that first the blessing over the wine should be recited and then the blessing over "the day".

EXPLANATIONS (continued):

9:
We now come to discuss the substance of the first item of disagreement between Bet Hillel and Bet Shammai in this present chapter. It concerns the recital of Kiddush on Shabbat and Yom Tov. The Kiddush, [usually] recited over wine, is a declaratory statement made before the festive spread to the effect that the day is holy. Kiddush on Shabbat Eve consists to two berakhot: a berakhah over wine [assuming that wine is being used, as is almost universally the case] and then a berakhah which declares the sanctity of the day. On all festival evenings (with the sole exception of the last day/s of Pesaĥ) a third blessing is added, called Birkat ha-Zeman [the blessing of the season], known familiarly as she-he-ĥe-yanu. The order of berakhot here described is in accordance with the opinion of Bet Hillel as brought in our Mishnah. (In the vast majority of cases, where there is a maĥloket [difference of opinion] between Bet Hillel and Bet Shammai, the halakhah is in accord with the opinion of Bet Hillel.) The Gemara explains the rationale of this difference of opinion as follows:

Bet Shammai hold that the berakhah over the sanctity of the day should come first since it is only because the day is holy that we shall drink the wine; what is more, from the chronological point of view, the day has commenced (with the onset of dark) before Kiddush is recited declaring it to be holy. Bet Hillel hold that the berakhah over the wine should come first: the institution of Kiddush itself is based on the Biblical verse [Exodus 20:7] "Remember the Sabbath day, to sanctify it". (The parallel verse in Deuteronomy reads 'Keep' instead of 'Remember'.) On these verses a midrash seems to give the Hebrew verb 'remember' its other meaning, 'to mention': "'Mention' it over wine… 'Keep' it by refraining from 'work' [melakhah]… In what manner do you 'sanctify' it? – sanctify it with sweet Shabbat food, with scented wine and smart clothing… Sanctify it with a berakhah. Hence the sages said 'Sanctify it over wine'…" [Midrash Tannaim on Deuteronomy 5:12]. This midrash – "'Mention' it over wine" affords Bet Hillel with an additional rationale for putting the wine first: Kiddush may not be recited without wine. (And even if ĥallot are used instead, their berakhah should come first.)

DISCUSSION:

I have received several messages concerning the issue raised by Reuven Boxman concerning the nature of the wines in Rabbinic times. You will recall that I had originally explained that In rabbinic times the wine was bottled "neat" and in order for it to be drinkable it had to be diluted with water. Reuven had commented that to the best of my knowledge wine then, as well as wine today, is fermented naturally, and the fermentation process comes to a halt when the alcohol content reaches approximately 12-13%. The only way to get a "stronger" wine is by distillation, which today we would not call wine, but rather spirits, and I don't think that the mishnah is referring to a distilled product. Since I am quite unknowledgable in this matter, I requested assistance.

First of all I checked with all the classical commentators and found that my statement reflected their teachings. For example, Rambam comments on this mishnah: their wine was so strong that it was undrinkable before being diluted with much water.

Andy Berkowitz explains: Wines's alcohol content derives from the sugar content of the grape juice used. Yeast is used to convert the sugar to alcohol and carbon dioxide. The CO2 is given off as a gas, but the alcohol remains. Different grape varieties and different growing climates produce grapes with varying sugar content. Also, sugar can be added before fermentation to increase the alcohol content. Because high-alcohol wines last longer than low-alcohol wines, the vintners may have intentionally created stronger wines. Today, many wines makers start with grape juice concentrate. Because concentrate weighs less than juice, it is easier and cheaper to transport. It is later diluted. Perhaps the same process was followed in Talmudic times. [I comment about the possibility raised by Andy in his last sentence that it does not seem to be the case: the process of making wine in ancient Israel is described in Encyclopedia Judaica 6:1417-1418.]

Reuven Lerner quotes from a book ["On Food and Cooking: The Science and Lore of the Kitchen", by Harold McGee, published in 1984 by Collier Books)]. In Chapter 9 ("Wine, Beer, and Distilled Liquors"), McGee says (p. 427):

By Homer's time, about 700 BC, wine had become a staple beverage in Greece, one that was made strong, watered down before drinking, and graded in quality for freeman and slave. The Greek for "to breakfast," akratidzomai, meant literally "to drink undiluted wine" (it was used as a dip for pieces of bread)

Reuven Boxman's comment regarding the alcohol content of wine is indeed correct. As McGee says on p. 431:

The origins of distilled liquors, though much more recent than those of wine and beer, are just as obscure. Because alcohol is toxic to all organisms, even the yeasts that excrete it cannot tolerate an environment that is more than about 15% alcohol, and this was as strong as wine or beer could get until a way of concentrating alcohol was found. The process of distillation is made possible by the fact that the boiling point of alcohol is about 173° F (78° C), or almost 40Ĕ lower than that of water. This means that if a mixture of water and alcohol is heated to the boil, more of the alcohol than the water will end up in the initial vapor.

Did the Greeks (and thus the rabbis of the Talmud) know about distillation? McGee seems to think not, and quotes Aristotle, whose Meteorology (Book 2) describes the amazing science of distillation without mentioning wine or beer even once. McGee says (p. 432):

Surely Aristotle would have mentioned the remarkable properties of the "water" distilled from wine if they had been noticed. Instead, the Greeks seem to have treated both salt and alcohol as impurities. According to a book on the history of Indian food and drink, distilled rice or barley liquor was appreciated there around 800 BC, several centuries before Aristotle. If so, the knowledge remained isolated for almost 1000 years.



דילוג לתוכן