Berakhot 018
|
BET MIDRASH VIRTUALI
of the Rabbinical Assembly in Israel
RABIN MISHNAH STUDY GROUP
|
|
|
In the morning two blessings are to be made before it and one after it; in the evening there are two before it and two after it – one long and one short. Where they determined that it should be long one may not make it short, where short one may not make it long. Where [they determined] it should be concluded one may not refrain from concluding it, and vice-versa.
EXPLANATIONS:
1:
There is a special class of blessings which we call birkhot ha-mitzvot. The usual formula for these runs Barukh attah Adonai Eloheynu Melekh ha-Olam asher kideshanu bemitzvotav vetzivanu … – praising God for having given us the specific mitzvah that we are about to perform. In this sense the Shema is a liturgical curiosity: it is a mitzvah commanded by the Torah for which we do not recite a specific blessing. There is no blessing that runs asher kideshanu bemitzvotav vetzivanu al keriat Shema [Who has made us holy … by commanding us to recite the Shema]. I do believe that such a blessing was found in the Cairo Genizah – but then many curiosities were found there and that does not mean that such a berakhah was in general liturgical use in a meaningful way. Others have suggested that the three words that precede the Shema when it is recited in private, El Melekh ne’eman – "God is a faithful Sovereign", are somehow the liturgical remains of an ancient berakhah that fell into disuetude. They suggest this on the basis of the fact that the initial letters of these three Hebrew words spell out the letters of the word Amen. However the origin of the custom of prefacing these three words when reciting the Shema in private is known, and can be traced back to Ĥassidei-Ashkenaz, supererogatory pietists in Medieval Germany and France; and their reasons had nothing whatsoever to do with a berakhah for the Shema. Therefore, the lack of such a berakhah remains a curiosity. 2: To be continued. DISCUSSION:
Ed Frankel writes of his experience in practical teaching:
In studying the times for earliest recitation of Shema, I have had students amazed by the different systems, particularly the differences in regard to color vision. I don't know exactly how blue real tchelet is, nor am I sure what shade karti -leek green – is, but it would almost seem to me that if one thinks of these colors in terms of photographic gray scales, it would take less light to distinguish between white and any shade, than it would to distinguish between pastels. To help students see this, I have used a simple device. I needed a dimmer switch and sheets of white, pale blue and pale green paper. I started the class in pitch black, and had a child slowly increase light levels until students could distinguish colors, and then raise it more until they could distinguish between colors. Students raised their hands as they could note color changes. The experiment worked, but it raised halachic difficulties. This account will be continued.
|