Avot269

of the Rabbinical Assembly in Israel
RABIN MISHNAH STUDY GROUP
TRACTATE AVOT, CHAPTER FOUR, MISHNAH TWENTY-FOUR (recap):
Elisha ben-Avuyah says: To what can one liken one who teaches a child? – to ink written on new paper; and to what can one liken one who teaches an old person? – to ink written on used paper.
EXPLANATIONS (continued):
13:
We must now turn our attention to the third of the possible causes of the apostasy of Elisha ben-Avuya. His rejection of Pharisaic Judaism may have come about – at least in part – because of a theological crisis. While it is most probable that all the elements that we have mentioned so far contributed to a gradual distancing from the Judaism that he had known and loved, it seems to me that the final break came as the result of an incident he witnessed which left such a theological trauma that he could no longer maintain his status as a believing Jew and a halakhic authority with integrity. In order to understand the incident and his reaction to it we must offer prior explanation.
14:
When we studied the third mishnah of the first chapter of this tractate [Avot 020] we learned the exhortation of Antigonos of Sokhoh: "Do not be like servants who serve the master in order to receive a reward." In other words, one should not observe God's commandments in the expectation of a reward for that observance – worldly success or eternal life suggest themselves. And when we discussed this teaching of Antigonos [Avot 023] we quoted extensively from Rambam's Mishnah commentary:
When we observe Torah for some reason other than itself the sages call this "for an ulterior motive". That means that someone keeps the commandments, studies Torah and makes an effort to be a religious Jew not for these virtues themselves but for some other benefit that will accrue. The sages warn us [Avot 4:7 Avot 228] "Do not make them a crown with which to glorify yourself or a spade with which to dig" and thereby they hint that one should not have any other purpose to one's observance – not to be honoured by people, not to gain wealth, not to occupy oneself with God's Torah in order to earn a living: the only purpose of learning Torah should be knowing it… The perfect person should not ask, "When I perform the commandments which are the true virtues and when I keep clear of the sins which are the bad vices that God has commanded us not to do – what will be the reward that I will get for doing so?" This would be like the child asking what he will be given if he learns. This is what that most excellent of men, Antigonos of Sokhoh, was hinting at when he said [Avot 1:3] "Do not be like servants who serve the master in order to receive a reward, but be like servants who serve the master in order not to receive a reward." He means that one should believe in the truth because it is true. It is this that we call worship out of love, and the sages said [Avodah Zarah 19a], "'Taking great delight in His commandments' [Psalm 112:1] – Rabbi Eli'ezer said 'in His commandments' – not in the reward for keeping His commandments.
15:
However, despite this excellent attitude, twice in the Torah a commandment is given and the reward for observing it is directly mentioned. One is very well-known and oft quoted:
Honour your father and your mother, that your days may be long upon the land that God gives you. [Exodus 20:12]
The second such commandment is less well-known:
If, along the road, you chance upon a bird’s nest, in any tree or on the ground, with fledglings or eggs and the mother sitting over the fledglings or on the eggs, do not take the mother together with her young. Let the mother go, and take only the young, in order that you may fare well and have a long life. [Deuteronomy 22:6-7]
We note that in both cases the promised reward for observance is length of days.
To be continued.
DISCUSSION:
Jum Feldman writes:
Is not Elisha ben-Avuyah the protagonist of "As a Driven Leaf" Milton Steinberg's novel (now published in paperback with a forward by Chaim Potok?) Since most of the "stuff" we have on ben Avuyah is somewhat remote commentary by others, an historical novel can as good a way to look at the events as any other. I read the book some years ago, but remember it with some pleasure. The original was published in 1939.
I respond:
Yes, this is indeed so. I am afraid that I have yet to read this novel: I hope to do so after my retirement! I don't understand why Jim should think that a historical novel (even one published more than six decades ago that has stood the test of time) should be preferred as a source over information from sources almost contemporary with the protagonist. Admittedly both the authors of the classical sources and the author of the novel had "an axe to grind", and we must constantly be aware of this animus, but I do not think that there is any reason to prefer Rabbi Milton Steinberg as a source to the Talmuds and the Midrashim.
Donation Form