Avot183
|
BET MIDRASH VIRTUALI
of the Rabbinical Assembly in Israel
RABIN MISHNAH STUDY GROUP
|
|
|
TRACTATE AVOT, CHAPTER THREE, MISHNAH TWELVE (recap):
Rabbi El'azar ha-Moda'i says: One who desecrates [Israel's] sancta, who despises the holy days, who shames another in public, who abrogates the covenant of Father Abraham, and who relates to the Torah inappropriately – even if he is possessed of Torah [learning] and good deeds he shall have no share in the next world.
EXPLANATIONS (continued):
9:
Who shames another in public: the translation 'shames' is, in fact, an interpretation, for the Hebrew means 'to whiten', and perhaps should be rendered "who causes the face of another to go white in public". There is an interesting sociological nuance here. Rambam, in his commentary on our mishnah, simply assumes that one's face goes white when one feels shame. In western society today, I think, one would usually associate the whitening of a face with great anger. I am not competent to state whether these physiological changes vary from culture to culture and from age to age. 10:
A tanna taught in the presence of Rav Naĥman bar-Yitzĥak: Anyone who causes the face of another to go white in public is to be considered [guilty of] bloodshed. He [Rav Naĥman] responded, "Well said! For we see how the redness goes and the white comes [in its place]." Abbayyé asked Rav Dimi, "In Eretz-Israel which [mitzvah] is most diligently observed?" He responded, "[not to cause] a whitening of the face."
Since the blood drains from the face the person who caused this is deemed as having shed that blood! When Rav Dimi, on a visit to Babylon from Eretz-Israel, was asked by Abbayyé which mitzvah is most carefully observed by the sages of Eretz-Israel he replied that they take great care to to cause the face of another to go white in public.
11: 12: 13:
Do not hate your brother in your heart: remonstrate with your colleague; do not incur sin because of him.
Rashi interprets the last clause as warning us not to shame another in public when performing this mitzvah of remonstration. (Other commentators give the clause a different interpretation.)
To be continued. DISCUSSION:
In Avot 177, in response to a query, I quoted Rambam [Talmud Torah 3:10]:Anyone who decides to study Torah [exclusively] – not to engage in a trade but to live off charity – is desecrating God's name, bringing the Torah into disrepute, quenching the brightness of the faith, doing himself a disservice and denying himself the life to come… Any Torah[-study] which is not accompanied by earning a living in the end will be void and simply encourage sin. Ultimately such a person will be robbing the public.
Haim Lerner writes: Are not those who occupy the ultra-orthodox "kollelim" in Bnei Brak and Jerusalem aware of the Rambam's admonition not to study Torah to the exclusion of earning a livelihood for one's self and one's family?? I respond: We have dealt with this matter several times in the past. Please visit the Discussion segment in Avot 166 where you will find links to the other places where this issue has already been dealt with. Also in Avot 177 I wrote about Rabbi Dosa ben-Hyrkanos: As far as I am aware the teaching which is the substance of our present mishnah is the only statement attributed to this sage in our classical sources. Shoshana Zucker writes: By what might be considered a strange coincidence, I encountered Rabbi Dosa ben-Hyrkanos earlier today in Mishna Rosh Hashanah 2:8 where he appears in the dispute between Rabban Gamliel and Rabbi Yehoshua over the date of Yom Kippur. I respond: My face is red (but definitely not white)! Thank you so much for this correction. I have amended the original shiur in the archives accordingly.
A HAPPY PURIM TO ONE AND ALL!
![]() |
