Halakhah Study Group 027
|
BET MIDRASH VIRTUALI
of the Rabbinical Assembly in Israel
HALAKHAH STUDY GROUP
|
|
141:5
|
אין הצבור רשאים לענות אמן עד שתכלה ברכה מפי הקורא ואין הקורא רשאי לקרות בתורה עד שיכלה אמן מפי הצבור:
The congregation may not respond Amen until the cessation of the blessing of the reader, nor may the reader begin reading from the Torah until the cessation of the Amen of the congregation.
EXPLANATIONS:
1:
Let me start off our study of this paragraph of Section 141 by recalling something that I wrote in RMSG several years ago while we were studying tractate Berakhot [October 10th 1997]:
We should respond Amen to any berakhah that we hear another Jew reciting. Indeed, in order to enable us to do so it is halakhically preferable that we recite all our berakhot out loud and not mumble them to ourselves or whisper them so that we barely hear them ourselves! I have already pointed out that the meaning of Amen is something like "I wish to be associated with what you just said" or "I wish I had said that" or "That goes for me too!" This being the case, it is obvious that it is quite inappropriate for us to recite Amen to our own berakhah. Indeed, the Tur [Rabbi Asher ben-Yeĥi'el, Western Europe, 13th century] states [Oraĥ Ĥayyim 61] that to do so is to be in error.
And while we are quoting let us add another relevant passage, this time from the Gemara [Berakhot 47a]
We should not respond with a 'snatched Amen', nor with a 'decorated Amen', nor with an 'orphaned Amen'.
Having presented the 'evidence' let us now hear the argument of the case.
2: 3: 4: 5: 6: DISCUSSION:
In HSG 025 we mentioned the talmudic ruling that "two voices cannot be heard simultaneously". This has prompted
Lawrence Charap to write: I would appreciate it if you would answer a question I have long had in regard to this section. It is very common — nearly universal, in my experience – in Conservative synagogues in the US for the congregation, gabbais, etc. to "join in" the Torah reader as he/she finishes the aliyah with the last three words (and their melody), and for everyone to thus "sing" them aloud. However, doesn't this custom violate the dictum that two do not read the Torah at the same time? I respond: Yes, it does. However, here I would not recommend that you embark on a crusade to stamp out this error. I feel that here it would be better to be guided by the daring rabbinic teaching of leaving people in their error: "It is better that they act in ignorance than that they do so deliberately" [Betzah 30a]. This is even more the case when what prompts this innocent error is the fact that the congregation is caught up in the joy of the reading. In this same matter Martin J. Lederman writes: I recently attended a Bat Mitzva at a Conservative synagogue where the celebrant was a lovely young woman who has special needs.This woman loves everything Jewish and attends services every Shabbat and Yom Tov. During the Torah reading, she chanted the Maftir portion accompanied by the cantor. There was not a dry eye in the congregation. Since two people read the Torah simultaneously, was this a violation of Jewish law? I respond: I think that the same reasoning applies here as before: even if it is an error it is a most blessed and honourable error. Surely, one of the traits that generally distinguishes the halakhic stance of Conservative Judaism from that of orthodoxy is that where we deem it necessary we are more prepared to temper the strictures of received halakhah with the social values of 'goodness, kindness and mercy'. More of your queries and comments next time. |